Dvostruki standardi zaštite prisilnih migranata u zemljama Evropske unije: primer Mađarske i Poljske
Ključne reči:
prisilne migracije, socijalna politika, integracija, rat, javni diskursApstrakt
Cilj ovog rada**** je analiza migracionih politika država Evropske unije (EU) tokom perioda od 2015. do 2023. godine, uz fokus na dvostruke standarde zaštite migranata. Rad je usmeren na utvrđivanje potencijalnih razlika u programima dostupnim migrantima iz zemalja Bliskog istoka i Severne Afrike (MENA – Middle East and North Africa) i iz Ukrajine, te kako se te razlike ogledaju u politikama zaštite migranata. Kroz komparativnu analizu programa, političkih odluka i medijske reprezentacije u državama EU, sa fokusom na Mađarsku i Poljsku, zaključujemo da su migranti MENA zemalja često suočeni sa ograničenim pravima, dok su migrantima iz Ukrajine dostupni povoljniji uslovi. Razlozi za ove razlike u tretmanu uključuju sigurnosne brige, predrasude i politički uticaj u zemljama prihvata. Rezultati ovog istraživanja pokazuju da primena takvih standarda stvara izazove u vezi sa poštovanjem temeljnih vrednosti jednakosti, solidarnosti i tolerancije, često dovodeći u pitanje doslednost evropskih politika.
Reference
1. ACAPS, ”Poland – Loss of temporary protection status and social benefits for Ukrainian refugees” Available from: https://www.acaps.org/fileadmin/Data_Product/Main_media/20231114_ACAPS_Thematic_report_Loss_of_temporary_protection_status_and_social_benefits_for_Ukrainian_refugees_in_Pol.pdf (Accessed January 24, 2024).
2. Alicja Zyguła, “Poland in the face of the 2015 migration crisis”, Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 155–166.
3. Amnesty International Publications, “Fenced out: Hungary’s violations of the rights of refugees and migrants”. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EUR2726142015ENGLISH.pdf (Accessed January 13, 2023).
4. ARAB NEWS [@arabnews], “Christians” and ”white” that is how NBC news reporter compared the difference between refugees. [Video]. Youtube. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFG2ZadDF9s (Accessed January 15, 2023).
5. ASILE, “Reasons for the Activation of the Temporary Protection Directive in 2022: A Tale of Double Standards”. Available from: https://www.asileproject.eu/reasons-for-the-activation-of-the-temporary-protection-directive-in-2022-a-tale-of-double-standards/ (Accessed January 19, 2023).
6. Bansak Kirk, Hainmueller Jens and Hangartner Dominik, ”How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers”, Science, Vol. 354, pp. 217–222.
7. Bizman Aharon, Yinon Yoel, “Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification”, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 191–196.
8. “Council Directive on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof”Official Journal of the European Communities, 2001/55/EC of 20July 2001.
9. Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, ”Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union”, European Union, 2008/C 115/01, 13 December 2007, čl. 80.
10. Crawley Heaven, Castles Stephen and Loughna Sean, States of Conflict: Causes and Patterns of Forced Migration to the EU and Policy Responses, Institute of Public Policy Research, London, 2003.
11. De Genova Nicholas, “Migrant ‘ilegality’ and deportability in everyday life”, Annual Reviews of Anthropology, 2002/31, pp. 419–447.
12. Eberl Jakob-Moritz, Meltzer Christine, Heidenreich Tobias, Herrero Beatrice, Theorin Nora, Lind Fabienne, Berganza Rosa, Boomgaarden Hajo, Schemer Christian and Strömbäck Jesper, “The European media discourse on immigration and its effects: a literature review”, Annals of the International Communication Association, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 207–223.
13. European Investment Bank, “The needs of refugees”. Available from: https://www.eib.org/en/stories/ukrainian-poland-infrastructure-refugees (Accessed January 23, 2024).
14. Feischmidt Margit and Ildikó Zakariás, “Politics of care and compassion: Civic help for refugees and its political implications in Hungary—A mixed-methods approach”, in: Margit Feischmidt, Ludger Pries, and Celine Cantat (eds.), Refugee protection and civil society in Europe, Palgrave, Cham, 2019, pp. 59–99.
15. Georgiou Myria and Zaborowski Rafal, Media coverage of the ’refugee crisis’: A cross European perspective. Council of Europe Report: DG1(2017)03. Available from: https://edoc.coe.int/en/refugees/7367-media-coverage-of-the-refugee-crisis-a-cross-europeanperspective.html (Accessed October 7, 2023).
16. Gero Márton and Sik Endre, “The Moral Panic Button Construction and consequences”, in: Elzbieta Gozdziak, Izabella Main and Brigitte Suter (eds), Europe and the Refugee Response: A Crisis of Values?, Routledge, New York, 2020, pp. 38–54.
17. Goul Andersen Jørgen and Bjørklund Tor, “Structural Change and New Cleavages: The Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway”, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 33, No. 3 (1990), pp. 195–217.
18. Hainmueller Jens and Hopkins Daniel, “The hidden American immigration consensus: A conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 529–548.
19. Hirschman Albert Otto, Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1970.
20. Hungarian Helsinki Committee, Two years after: What’s left of refugee protection in Hungary? Information note by the Hungarian Helsinki Committee. Available from: https://helsinki.hu/wp-content/uploads/Two-years-after_2017.pdf. (Accessed January 23, 2024).
21. Hungarian Helsinki Committee, War in Ukraine Protection Situation in Hungary. Available from: https://helsinki.hu/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/03/War-in-Ukraine_1603update.pdf. (Accessed January 21, 2024).
22. IOM, Glossary on Migration (second edition), Geneva: International Organization for Migration, 2011. Available from: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iml25_1.pdf (Accessed November 5, 2023), p. 39.
23. IOM, World Migration Report 2020, Geneva: International Organization for Migration, 2020, Available from: https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf (Accessed August 14, 2023), p. 2.
24. Klaus Witold, “Between closing borders to refugees and welcoming Ukrainian workers: Polish migration law at the crossroads”. in: Elżbieta Goździak, Izabella Main and Brigitte Suter (Eds.), Europe and the Refugee Response, Routledge, New York, pp. 74–90.
25. Klaus Witold, Lévay Miklós, Rzeplińska Irena and Scheinost Miroslav, ”Refugees and asylum seekers in Central-European Countries – reality, politics and the creation of fear in societies”, in: Helmut Kury and Sławomir Redo (Eds.), Refugees and Migrants in Law and Policy Challenges and Opportunities for Global Civic Education, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 457–494.
26. Kunz Egon Fransis, ”The Refugee in Flight: Kinetic Models and forms of Displacement”, International Migration Review, Vol.7, No. 2, pp. 125–146.
27. Kyriazi Anna, “Ukrainian refugees in Hungary: Government measures and discourse in the first year of the war”. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4313945 (Accessed January 18, 2024).
28. Népszava, Orbán Viktor’s full statement about the terror attack in Paris. Available from: https://nepszava.hu/1044829_orban-viktor-teljes-nyilatkozata-a-parizsi-merenyletrol (Accessed February 1, 2024).
29. Nitszke Agnieszka, “Poland’s Response to the Migration Crisis on the PolishBelarusian Border in the Light of European Union Law”, Polskie Studia Politologiczne, Vol. 79, pp. 179–193.
30. Raičević Nebojša, „Izgradnja zajedničkog evropskog sistema azila i njegovo prilagođavanje masovnom prilivu migranata”, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, Vol. 71 (2015), str. 13–32.
31. Rédl Boglárka, Nagy Sarkadi Márton and Zubor Zalán, “Ukrainian refugees in Hungary: Volunteers are doing the government’s work”. Available from: https://vsquare.org/ukrainian-refugees-in-hungary-volunteers-are-doing-the-governments-work/ (Accessed January 19, 2024).
32. Reilly Rachael and Flynn Michael, The Ukraine Crisis: Double Standards, Has Europe’s Response to Refugees Changed? Global Detention Project. Available from: https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/the-ukraine-crisis-double-standards-has-europes-responseto-refugees-changed (Accessed October 7, 2023).
33. Reilly Rachael and Flynn Michael, “A Tale of Two Refugee Crises”, Inter Press Service. Available from: https://www.ipsnews.net/2022/03/tale-two-refugee-crises/ (Accessed January 8, 2023).
34. “Resolution of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland on Poland’s immigration policy”, Monitor Polski, item 370, April 13, 2016.
35. Richmond Anthony, “Reactive Migration: Sociological Perspectives On Refugee Movements”, Journal of Refugee Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1993, pp. 7–24.
36. Schultheis Emily, “Viktor Orbán: Hungary doesn’t want ‘Muslim invaders”, Politico, January 8, 2018, Available from: https://www.politico.eu/article/viktor-orban-hungary-doesnt-want-muslim-invaders/ (Accessed October 8, 2023).
37. Simonovits Bori, “The Public Perception of the Migration Crisis from the Hungarian Point of View: Evidence from the Field” in: Birgit Glorius, Jeroen Doomernik (eds.), Geographies of Asylum in Europe and the Role of European Localities, Springer, Switzerland AG, 2020, pp. 155–176.
38. Tamás Vaski, “Hungary Also Joins EU Refugee Protection Scheme. Hungary Today”. Available from: https://hungarytoday.hu/hungary-also-joins-refugee-protection-scheme/ (Accessed January 20, 2024).
39. UN General Assembly, “Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees”, United Nations Treaty Series, Vol. 189, July 28, 1951.
40. UNCHR, “Hungary: UNHCR Ukraine Refugee Situation Operational Update – 26 September 2022”. Available from: https://data.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/95796 (Accessed January 18, 2024).
41. UNCHR, “Hungary: Ukraine Situation Inter-Agency Operational Update – 10 May 2022”. Available from: https://data.unhcr.org/fr/documents/details/92769 (Accessed January 9, 2024).
42. UNHCR, “UNHCR expands operations in Poland to reach refugees from Ukraine amid rising vulnerabilities”. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/news/briefing-notes/unhcr-expands-operations-poland-reach-refugees-ukraine-amid-rising (Accessed January 21, 2024).
43. UNHCR. A million refugees and migrants flee to Europe in 2015. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/news/news-releases/million-refugees-and-migrants-flee-europe-2015 (Accessed January 4, 2023).
44. UNHCR. Ukraine Refugee Situation. Available from: https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine (Accessed January 4, 2023).
45. Velasco-González Karina, Verkuyten Maykel, Weesie Jeroen, Poppe Edwin, “Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory”, British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 667–685.
46. Walter Stephan, Cookie White Stephan, “Cognition and affect in stereotyping: Parallel interactive networks”, in: Diane M. Mackie, David L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception, Academic Press, Orlando, 1993, pp. 111–136.
47. Walter Stephan, Ybarra Oscar and Rios Morrison Kimberly, “Intergroup threat theory”, in: Todd Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination, Taylor and Francis, New York, 2009, pp. 43–59.
48. Zolberg Aristide, “The formation of new states as a refugee-generating process”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 467, No. 1, pp. 24–38.
