Savršene i nesavršene obaveze prema siromašnima
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Ključne reči:
siromaštvo, savršene i nesavršene obaveze, uslovi realizacije, negativne i pozitivne dužnostiApstrakt
Tekst se bavi karakterom obaveza prema smanjenju siromaštva. Polazne tačka u analizi su Kantovo razlikovanje potpunih i nepotpunih dužnosti i rekonceptualizacija ovog razlikovanja unutar etike dužnosti Onore O’Nil. Obaveze prema siromašnima smatraju se nesavršenim obavezama jer ne može se potpuno specifikovati korelativno pravo siromašnih na obezbeđivanje dobara i usluga. Zbog toga obaveze prema siromašnima spadaju u etiku vrlina, ne etiku prava. Prema ovom shvatanju, uslovi ispunjenja su sastavni deo opravdanja obaveze. Ovako protumačen uslov ispunjenja obaveza osporen je i relaksiran u teorijama Tomasa Pogea i Amartje Sena. Prema autoru, nedostaci u arhitektonici analiziranih teorija, kao i nedorečeni sporadični uvidi analiziranih autora ukazuju da je smanjenje siromaštva najbolje formulisati kao indirektnu savršenu obavezu.
Reference
[1] Amartya Sen, Rationality and Freedom, Belknap, Harvard University Press, 2002.
[2] Amartya Sen, “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights”, Source: Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2004.
[3] Amartya Sen, The Idea of Justice, Belknap, Harvard University Press, 2009.
[4] David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson, and Daniel Weinstock, Reading Onora O’Neill, London-NewYork: Routledge, 2013.
[5] David Bilitz, “Socio-economic rights, economic crisis, and legal doctrine” I•CON (2014), Vol. 12, No. 3, 710–739.
[6] Imanuel Kant, Metafizika morala, prev. Danilo Basta, Izdavačka knjižnica Zorana Stojanovića Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad, 1993
[7] James Griffin: On Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[8] Juha Raikka, “The Feasibility Condition in Political Theory”, Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 6. Nr. 1, 1998, str. 27–41.
[9] Mark S. Kende, “The South African Constitutional Court’s Embrace of SocioEconomic Rights: A Comparative Perspective”, Chapman Law Review, Vol. 6:137, p. 144.
[10] Martha Nussbaum, “Capabilities and Human Rights”, Global Justice and Transnational Politics, edited by Pablo De Greiff and Ciaran Cronin, The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England, 2002.
[11] Mark S. Kende, “The South African Constitutional Court’s Embrace of SocioEconomic Rights: A Comparative Perspective”, Chapman Law Review, Vol. 6:137
[12] Onora O’Neill, Faces of Hunger: An Essay on Poverty, Development and Justice, Cambridge University Press, 1986
[13] Onora O’Neill, Constructions of reason: Explorations of Kant’s practical philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[14] Onora O’Neill, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press. 1996.
[15] Onora O’Nil, „Tamna strana ljudskih prava“, u: Đorđe Pavićević (prir.), Preispitivanje ideje ljudskih prava, Službeni Glasnik, Beograd, 2011.
[16] Polly Vizard, Poverty and Human Rights: Sen’s ‘Capability Perspective’ Explored, Oxford University Press, 2006.
[17] Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books, 1974.
[18] Samuel Fleischaker, A Short History of Distributive Justice, Harvard Univer. Press, 2004.
[19] Susan Mendus, Impartiality in Moral and Political Philosophy, Oxford University Press. 2002.
[20] Thomas Pogge, Realizing Rawls, Cornell University Press, 1989.
[21] Thomas Pogge, Priorities of Global Justice, Metaphilosophy, Vol. 32, Nr. 1/2, January 2001.
[22] Thomas Pogge (ed), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, Oxford University Press. 2007.
[23] Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, Polity Press, drugo izdanje, 2008.
[24] Stephen Holmes and Cass R. Sunstein, The Cost of Rights, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1999.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
