Primena prakse zasnovane na dokazima u sprovođenju sankcija i mera prema prestupnicima u zajednici
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Ključne reči:
praksa zasnovana na dokazima, sankcije i mere u zajednici, RNR model, prestupnik, rehabilitacija, probacijaApstrakt
Praksa zasnovana na dokazima je aktuelan trend u gotovo svim oblastima humanih usluga, posledica je naučnog i tehnološkog razvoja tokom druge polovine XX veka sa potrebom i mogućnostima povezivanja i iskorišćenjaresursa iz različitih oblasti društvene delatnosti, u cilju humanijeg i efektivnijeg pristupa rešavanju ljudskih problema i potreba. Praksa zasnovana na dokazima u radu sa prestupnicima predstavlja skup komponenti i karakteristika programa rehabilitacije koji, kada se efikasno inkorporiraju u oblast promene kriminalnog ponašanja i stavova, smanjuje stopu recidiva. U radu sa prestupnicima praksa zasnovana na dokazima obuhvata validiranu procenu rizika i kriminogenih potreba, motivacione intervjue i kognitivno-bihejvioralne programe. Navedene elemente obuhvataju principi rizik-potreba-odgovor (RNR) modela, koji predstavlja teorijski i empirijski zasnovan pristup u radu sa maloletnim i odraslim prestupnicima, posebno na sprovođenju sankcija i mera u zajednici. Model obuhvata i razvoj validiranih instrumenata za procenu rizika i principe na dokazima zasnovane prakse isporučilaca rehabilitacionog tretmana.
Reference
[1] Andrews Donald A. and Bonta James, “Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice”, Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2010 , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–55.
[2] Andrews Donald A., Bonta James and Wormith Stephen, “The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment”, Crime & Delinquency, 2006, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 7–27.
[3] Andrews Donald A. and Dowden Craig, “The risk-need-responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: crime-prevention jurisprudence”, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2007, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 439–464.
[4] Andrews Donald A., Zinger Ivan, Hoge Robert, Bonta James, Gendreau Paul and Cullen Francis, “Does correctional treatment work – A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis”, Criminology, 1990, vol. 28. no. 3, pp.369–404.
[5] Bourgon Guy, Bonta James, Rugge Tanya, Scott Terri-Lynne and Yessine Annie, “Program design, implementation, and evaluation in ’Real World’ community supervision”, Federal Probation, 2010, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1–20.
[6] Bonta James, Rugge Tanya, Scott Terri-Lynne, Bourgon Guy and Yessine Annie, “Exploring the black box of community supervision”, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 2008, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 248–270.
[7] Chadwick Nick, Dewolf Angela and Serin Ralph, “Effectively training community supervision officers a meta-analytic review of the impact on offender outcome”, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2015, vol. 42, no. 10. pp. 977–989.
[8] Dowden Craig and Andrews D. A., “The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analytic review of core correctional practice”, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2004, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 203–214.
[9] “Evidence-based practices in the criminal justice system”, US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections (2013), p. 3. Available from: https://info.nicic.gov/nicrp/system/files/026917.pdf, (Accessed 2 August 2018).
[10] Haas Stephen and Spence Douglas, “Use of core correctional practice and inmate preparedness for release”, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2017, vol. 61, no. 13, pp. 1455–1478.
[11] “Implementing evidence – based practice in community corrections: The principles of effective intervention”, National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department ofJustice (2004).Available from:https://nicic.gov/implementing-evidence-basedpractice-community-corrections-principles-effective-intervention (Accessed 7 August 2018).
[12] Labrecque Ryan, Schweitzer Myrinda and Smith Paula, “Probation and parole officer adherence to the core correctional practices: An evaluation of 755 offenderofficer interactions”, Advancing Practice University of Cincinnati, 2013. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305005464_Probation_and_parole_officer_adherence_to_the_core_correctional_practices_An_evaluation_of_755_offender-officer_interactions (Accessed 7 August 2018).
[13] Paparozzi Mario and Gendreau Paul, “An intensive supervision program that worked: service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness”, The Prison Journal, 2005, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 445–466.
[14] Raynor Peter, “Evidence-based probation and its critics”, The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice, 2003, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 334–345.
[15] Robert Martinson, “What Works? – Questions and answers about prison reform”, The Public Interest, 1974, pp. 22–54.
[16] “Recommendation CM/Rec (2017) 3 on the European Rules on community sanctions and measures”. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/168070c09b / (Accessed 7 August 2018).
[17] Standardna minimalna pravila UN za mere alternativne institucionalnom tretmanu – Tokijska pravila. Dostupno preko: http://arhiva.mup.gov.rs/cms_lat/decaipolicija.nsf/6%20Tokijska%20pravila.pdf, (pristupljeno 12. 08. 2018).
[18] Sackett David, Straus Sharon, Richardson Scott, Rosenberg William & Haynes Brian (2000), Evidence based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.), New York: Churchill-Livingstone. In: Bruce Thyer, “What is evidence-based practice?”, Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 2004, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 167–176.
[19] Viglione Jill, “Street – level decision making: Acceptability, feasibility, and use of evidence-based practices in adult probation”, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2017, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1356 –1381.
[20] Viglione Jill, “A multi-level examination of organizational context on adult probation officer attitudes toward evidence-based practice”, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2018, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1331–1356.
[21] Viglione Jill, Blasko Brandy and Taxman Faye, “Organizational factors and probation officer use of evidence-based practices: A multilevel examination”, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2018, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1648–1667.
[22] Walters Scott, Clark Michael, Gingerich Ray and Meltze Melissa, A Guide for Probation and Parole Offenders to Chang, U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections, Washington (2007). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235792601_Motivating_Offenders_to_Change_A_Guide_for_Probation_and_Parole, (Accessed 12 August 2018), p. 4.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
