THE POSITION OF THE VISEGRAD GROUP STATES IN THE ”INITIATIVE 17+1”

Authors

  • Aleksandar Jazić Институт за међународну политику и привреду, Београд Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18485/

Keywords:

Initiative 17 + 1, Belt and Road Initiative, China, Visegrad Group countries, economic cooperation, trade cooperation, investments

Abstract

China has formed the “17 + 1 Initiative” in order to connect more closely with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. In addition to China, almost all countries of Eastern, Central and Southeastern Europe are gathered within this initiative. This initiative represents a political framework of cooperation whose purpose is the realization of large economic and investment projects through the “Belt and Road Initiative”. By entering new markets, China achieves security in the development of its economy, because it enables it to maintain a high level of production and at the same time a place to sell its products. The countries of the Visegrad Group have an important place for China, because they represent a bridge to the markets of Western Europe. These countries are members of the European Union, but cooperation with China is a good alternative for them to be less dependent on economic cooperation with Western European countries. On the other hand, China can more easily establish cooperation with these countries than with the countries of Western Europe, because they still need large investments. For the countries of the Visegrad Group, China is a new market on which they can easily place goods, thus ensuring stable economic functioning. In addition, they need to rebuild their infrastructure, and large Chinese investment projects are focused on that area.

References

[1] “Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries”; http://www.china-ceec.org/eng/, 22/06/2020.

[2] “China’s Twelve Measures for Promoting Friendly Cooperation with Central and Eastern European Countries”, Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries; http://www.china-ceec.org/eng/zdogjhz_1/t1410595.htm, 16/06/2020.

[3] Di Donato Giulia, “China’s Approach to the Belt and Road Initiative and Europe’s Response”, Italian Institute for International Political Studies; https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/chinas-approach-belt-and-road-initiative-and-europesresponse-25980, 19/06/2020.

[4] Fillová Natália, “Belt and Road Initiative: the Czech and the Slovak Approaches”, The Skeptik, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2018.

[5] Fürst Rudolf, “The Czech Republic: New Strategic Partnership with China, yet Little Real OBOR Touch”, in: Frans-Paul van der Putten, John Seaman, Mikko Huotari, Alice Ekman and Miguel Otero-Iglesias (eds.), Europe and China’s New Silk Roads, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, The Hague, 2016.

[6] Kironská Kristína and Turcsányi Richard Q, “Slovak policy towards China in the age of Belt and Road Initiative and 16+1 Format”, China-CEE Institute, Budapest, 2017.

[7] Li Jiang, “The 16 + 1 Mechanism and One Belt One Road Initiative, New Channels of Promoting Sino-Czech Relations”, Global Economic Observer, Vol. 5, Issue 1,2017.

[8] Maráczi Fanni, “The presentation of the ’16 + 1 Cooperation’”; http://beltandroadcenter.org/2017/11/07/the-presentation-of-the-16-1-cooperation/, 28/06/2020.

[9] Matura Tamas, “Hungary: Along the New Silk Road across Central Europe”, in: Frans-Paul van der Putten, John Seaman, Mikko Huotari, Alice Ekman and Miguel Otero-Iglesias (eds.), Europe and China’s New Silk Roads, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, The Hague, 2016.

[10] Matura Tamas, “The Belt and Road Initiative depicted in Hungary and Slovakia”, Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, Vol. 7, Issue 2, p. 9, 2018.

[11] Pendrakowska Patrycja, “Poland’s perspective on the Belt and Road”, Initiative Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2018.

[12] Plecshová Gabriela, “Slovakia: Disconnected from China’s New Silk Road”, in: Frans-Paul van der Putten, John Seaman, Mikko Huotari, Alice Ekman and Miguel Otero-Iglesias (eds.), Europe and China’s New Silk Roads, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, The Hague, 2016.

[13] “Premier: Outcomes of China-CEEC cooperation exceed expectation”, Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries; http://www.china-ceec.org/eng/zyxw_4/t1575553.htm, 23/06/2020.

[14] Szunomar Agnes, “Hungarian and Chinese economic relations and opportunities under the Belt and Road initiative”, working paper, China-CEE Institute, Budapest, Hungary, 2017.

[15] Szczudlik Justyna, “Poland on the Silk Road in Central Europe: To Become a Hub of Hubs?”, in: Frans-Paul van der Putten, John Seaman, Mikko Huotari, Alice Ekman and Miguel Otero-Iglesias (eds.), Europe and China’s New Silk Roads, Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, The Hague, 2016.

[16] Wensink C., Crollius A.R., van deer Geest, W., Li, T., van Berne, B., and Li, K, ”The Road to Holland The Belt and Road Initiative: implications and opportunities of rail freight transport between China and the Netherlands”, Panteia, Zoetermeer, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

THE POSITION OF THE VISEGRAD GROUP STATES IN THE ”INITIATIVE 17+1”. (2020). Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih Nauka, 14(24), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.18485/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 56

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.