TV DEBATES IN SERBIA AFTER 2012: DEMOCRATIC ’FACADE’ OR PLATFORM FOR DIALOGUE?

Authors

  • Bojan Klačar doktor političkih nauka i izvršni direktor Centra za slobodne izbore i demokratiju (CeSID) iz Beograda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18485/

Keywords:

elections, election campaigns, media, political parties, TV debates

Abstract

The paper analyses whether TV debates after 2012 elections enhanced political dialogue and offered a credible platform for equal political treatment of political parties in the context of an unequal political competition and biased media (towards the ruling party). The subject of the paper is a detailed analysis of 22 ‘Word on Word’ election debates in terms of their issue framework, equality of participants, influence (through a case study of the 2022 election), the difference between parliamentary and presidential debates and the role of debates in the wider media environment. The author examines whether the debates encouraged changes in the media environment and whether they led to the improvement of media environment. Specifically, the purpose was to determine whether these debates could provide a credible platform for political dialogue or whether they are a democratic `façade`, as described by a part of the critically oriented public. The analysis takes into account the context that the opposition exists and that there are no systematic obstructions to its work and participation in the elections. On the other hand, the dominance of the ruling parties in terms of resources and the ability to influence the disintegrating processes in the opposition has led to unequal treatment and unfair political competition.

References

[1] Benoit L. William, Political Election Debate – Informing Voters about Policy and Character, Lexington Books, 2014.

[2] Bertelsmann’s Transformation Index, BTI 2022 Country Report – Serbia. Available from https://bti-project.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2022_SRB.pdf (Accessed July 31, 2023).

[3] Debates International. Available from https://www.debatesinternational.org/(Accessed July 31, 2023).

[4] Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), Democracy Index 2022. Available from https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022/ (Accessed July 31, 2023).

[5] Freedom House, Freedom in the World – Serbia. Available from https://freedomhouse.org/country/serbia/freedom-world/2022; Nations in Transit – Serbia. Available from https://freedomhouse.org/country/serbia/nations-transit/2022 (Accessed July 31, 2023).

[6] Ipsos Strategic Marketing, Analiza medijskog tržišta u Srbiji, Beograd, 2015, dostupno preko https://www.rem.rs/uploads/files/izvestaji%20o%20nadzoru/Analiza%20medijskog%20trzista%20u%20Srbiji%20IPSOS%20avgust%202015.pdf

[7] Kardović Danko, TV u 2020. Summa Summarum, Direct Media United Solutions, Beograd, januar 2021.

[8] Kancelarija OEBS-a za demokratske institucije i ljudska prava (KDILJP), Predsednički i vanredni parlamentarni izbori 3. april 2022. Konačni izveštaj, Varšava, 2022.

[9] Kancelarija OEBS-a za demokratske institucije i ljudska prava (KDILJP), Parlamentarni izbori 21. jun 2020. Konačni izveštaj, Varšava, 2020.

[10] Klačar Bojan, „Zašto su važne izborne debate?” u Bojan Klačar (ur.), Priručnik za organizaciju izbornih TV debata, Centar za slobodne izbore i demokratiju (CeSID), Beograd, 2017.

[11] Klačar Bojan, „Analiza okvira poruka u političkom oglašavanju na televiziji u kampanjama za parlamentarne izbore u Srbiji od 2000. do 2016. godine”, doktorska teza, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka, 2020.

[12] Klačar Bojan i Emilija Orestijević, „CeSID i predizborna kampanja”, u Bojan Klačar (ur.), Oko izbora 23, CeSID, Beograd, 2022.

[13] Krstić Aleksandra, „TV dueli kandidata za predsednika Srbije od 2002. do 2012. godine”, u Milan Jovanović i Dušan Vučićević (ur.), Kako, koga i zašto smo birali, Izbori u Srbiji 1990–2020. godine, Službeni glasnik, Institut za političke studije i Fakultet političkih nauka, 2020, Beograd, 429–449.

[14] Maier Jürgen & Thorsten Faas (2011), “‘Miniature Campaigns’ in Comparison: The German Televised Debates, 2002–09”, German Politics, 20(1): 75–91.

[15] Patterson Miles L., Mary E. Churchill, Gary K. Burger & Jack L. Powell, “Verbal and nonverbal modality effects on impressions of political candidates: Analysis from the 1984 presidential debates”, Communication Monographs, 1992, 59, 231–242.

[16] Radio-televizija Srbije, Decenija televizijske dominacije: RTS najgledaniji i u 2020. godini, RTS, Beograd, 30.12.2020, dostupno preko https://www.rts.rs/rts/rts-predstavlja/najnovije/4206121/decenija-televizijske-dominacije-rts-najgledaniji-i-u-2020-godini.html

[17] Schulz Winfried, “Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept”, European Journal of Communication, 2004, 19: 1, 87–101

[18] V-Dem institute, Democracy Report 2022 – Autocratization Changing Nature? Available from https://v-dem.net/media/publications/dr_2022.pdf (Accessed July 31, 2023).

[19] Matić Jovanka i Snježana Milivojević, „Tri decenije izborne komunikacije”, u Milan Jovanović i Dušan Vučićević (ur.), Kako, koga i zašto smo birali, Izbori u Srbiji 1990–2020. godine, Službeni glasnik, Institut za političke studije i Fakultet političkih nauka, 2020, Beograd, 347–399.

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

TV DEBATES IN SERBIA AFTER 2012: DEMOCRATIC ’FACADE’ OR PLATFORM FOR DIALOGUE?. (2023). Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih Nauka, 17(30), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.18485/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)