Prava domorodaca na resurse: Zašto se (ne) mogu opravdati?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Ključne reči:
domorodačko stanovništvo, pravo na resurse, princip privrženosti, redistributivna pravda, liberalni egalitarizamApstrakt
Rad ispituje da li domorodačko stanovništvo treba da ima pravo da upravlja resursima na teritoriji koju nastanjuje. Rad pokazuje kako etatistički argument prema kojem resursi treba da pripadnu državi nije moralno opravdan. Takođe pokazuje i kako je pravo na samoopredeljenje previše moralno arbitrarno kako bi opravdalo vlasništvo domorodaca nad resursima. Zbog toga rad tvrdi da je princip privrženosti najbolji način da se opravda vlasništvo domorodaca nad resursima. Rad pokazuje i pojedine probleme principa privrženosti i nudi „princip ograničene privrženosti” kao rešenje. Rad na osnovu toga tvrdi da se prava domorodaca na resurse mogu opravdati samo ukoliko je teritorija na kojoj se resursi nalaze neophodna za ostvarivanje životnih planova domorodaca i ukoliko to ostvarivanje ne zadire u osnovna ljudska prava ostalog stanovništva.
Reference
[1] “Universal Declaration on Human Rights”, United Nations, No. 217, Paris, 1948.
[2] “Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention”, International Labour Organization, No. 169, 1989.
[3] “Indigenous and Tribal Populations Convention”, International Labour Organization, No. 107, 1957.
[4] “United Nations Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples”, United Nations, No. 61/295, New York, 2007.
[5] Armstrong, Chris, “Against ’Permanent Sovereignty’ over Natural Resources”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, Vol .14, No. 2, 2015, pp. 129–151, .
[6] Armstrong, Chris, “Natural Resources: The Demands of Equality”, Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2013, pp. 331–347.
[7] Armstrong, Chris, “Justice, Attachment and Natural Resources”, Jornal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2013, pp. 48–65.
[8] Atkinson, Giles and Kirk Hamilton, “Savings, Growth and the Resource Curse Hypothesis”, World Development, Vol. 31, No. 11, 2003, pp. 1793–1807.
[9] Beljinac, Nikola, Predmet i priroda patriotske privrženosti u pluralnim društvima, doktorska teza, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka, 2019.
[10] Beteille, Andre, “The Idea of Indigenous People”, Current Anthropology, Vol. 39, No. 2, 1998, pp. 187–192.
[11] Finer, Matt, Jenkins N. Clinton, Pimm L. Stuart, Brian Keane, and Carl Ross, “Oil and Gas Projects in the Western Amazon: Threats to Wilderness, Biodiversity, and Indigenous Peoples”, PLoS ONE, Vol. 3, No. 8, 2008: e2932.
[12] Hodgson, Dorothy L, “Introduction: Comparative Perspectives on the Indigenous Rights Movement in Africa and the Americas”, American Anthropologist, Vol. 104, No. 4, 2002, pp. 1037–1049.
[13] Hyde, Tim, “Are Colonial Era Borders Drawn by Europeans holding Africa Back?”, American Economic Association, July 31, 2016. Available from: https://www.aeaweb.org/research/are-colonial-era-borders-holding-africa-back (Accessed May 28, 2022).
[14] Kymlicka, Will, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[15] Moore, Margaret, “Natural Resources, Territorial Right and Global Distributive Justice”, Political Theory, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2012, pp. 84–107.
[16] Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 1999.
[17] Swift, Adam, Political Philosophy: A Beginner’s Guide for Students and Politicians, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.
[18] United Nations, “United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples”, 2022. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html (Accessed May 28, 2022).
[19] Vujačić, Ivan i Jelica Petrović-Vujačić, „Ekonomski sistemi i novi politički kapitalizam”, Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, Vol. 12, No. 19, 2018, pp. 107–121.
[20] Wenar, Leif, “John Rawls”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2017. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/rawls/ (Accessed May 22, 2022).
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
