Internet suverenitet sa kineskim karakteristikama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Ključne reči:
Internet suverenitet, upravlјanje Internetom, Kina, kontrola, nadzorApstrakt
Razvoj savremenih informaciono-komunikacionih tehnologija, kao i povećanje broja korisnika, pogodovalo je intenziviranju debate o upravljanju Internetom na međunarodnim forumima. S jedne strane, SAD insistiraju na ”Multi-stakeholder Internet Governance” modelu, dok, s druge, Kina sve glasnije zagovara model „Internet suvereniteta” – multilateralni pristup u kojem bi sve države svijeta slobodno birale vlastiti put sajber razvoja, te nijedna država ne bi imala poziciju da primjenjuje sajber hegemoniju. Ovaj model je svakako naišao na kritiku na Zapadu, jer je označen kao platforma za jačanje kontrole i narušavanja građanskih sloboda. S druge strane, svjedoci smo da i određene zapadne države rade na uspostavljanju veće kontrole u vlastitom sajber prostoru, te je njihova kritika kineskog modela utoliko manje uvjerljiva. Sve u svemu, Kina kao prva „Internet suverena” država otišla je toliko daleko u domenu tehničkog i legislativnog unapređenja vlastitog sajber prostora, da je teško zamisliti da se postojeće stanje vrati na početne pozicije, posebno ako se uzme u obzir i rast političke i ekonomske moći ove mnogoljudne države. Skloniji smo zaključku da će u budućoj globalnoj debati o upravljanju Internetom argumenti biti sve više na kineskoj strani, te da je pred nama novo doba sajber suverenih država.
Reference
[1] Bundestag zabranjuje govor mržnje i izmišljene vesti, Politika, 2017. Dostupno preko: http://www.politika.rs/sr/clanak/377889/Bundestag-zabranjuje-govor-mrznjei-izmisljene-vesti (Pristupljeno 10. decembra 2017).
[2] Chen, Wenhong, “Taking stock, moving forward: the Internet, social networks and civic engagement in Chinese societies”, Information, Communication & Society, 17:1. 1–6, Routledge, London, 2014, p. 1.
[3] China Internet Users, Internet Live Stats, 2016. Available from: http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/china/ (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[4] China’s internet – A giant cage, The Economist, 2013. Available from: http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21574628-internet-was-expected-help-democratise-china-instead-it-has-enabled (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[5] Dangerously disproportionate – The ever-expanding National Security State in Europe, Amnesty International, 2017. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/EUR0153422017ENGLISH.PDF (Accessed 8 December 2017).
[6] Fu, King-wa and Chau, Michael, Reality check for the Chinese microblog space: A random sampling approach, PloS One, Vol.8(3), 2013. Available from: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058356, (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[7] Gurstein, Mike, Multistakeholderism vs. Democracy: My Adventures in ”Stakeholderland”, Web blog post, 2013. Available from: https://gurstein.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/multistakeholderism-vs-democracy-my-adventures-instakeholderland (Accessed 8 December 2017).
[8] Herold, David Kurt, “Noise, spectacle, politics: carnival in Chinese cyberspace” in: David Kurt Herold, Peter Marolt (ed.), Online Society in China – Creating, celebrating, and instrumentalising the online carnival, Routledge, London, 2011, p. 1.
[9] Hope, Christopher, Exclusive Spies and civil servants who leak secrets face 14 years in jail in first overhaul of the Official Secrets Act for 100 years, The Telegraph, 2017. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/02/exclusive-spiescivil-servants-leak-secrets-face-14-years-jail/ (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[10] International Telecommunication Union, Collection of the basic texts adopted by the Plenipotentiary Conference, 2015. Available from: http://search.itu.int/history/Histor yDigitalCollectionDocLibrary/5.21.61.en.100.pdf (Accessed 8 December 2017).
[11] Investigatory Powers Act 2016, Parliament UK, 2016. Available from: http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2015-16/investigatorypowers.html (Accessed 7 December 2017).
[12] Kelly, Sanja, Truong, Mai, Shahbaz, Adrian and Earp, Madeline, Silencing the Messenger: Communication Apps under Pressure – Freedom on the Net 2016 – Annual report, Freedomhouse, 2016. Available from: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/freedom-net-2016 (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[13] Larson, Christina, Zhai, Keith, Ramli, David and Yuan, Gao, China Adopts Cybersecurity Law Despite Foreign Opposition, Bloomberg Technology, 2016. Available from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-07/chinapasses-cybersecurity-law-despite-strong-foreign-opposition (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[14] Limbago, Andrea, The global push for cyber sovereignty Is the beginning of cyber fascism, The Hill, 2016. Available from: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/310382-the-global-push-for-cyber-sovereignty-is-the-beginning-of (Accessed 8 December 2017).
[15] Liu, Fengshu, Urban Youth in China: Modernity, the Internet and the Self, Routledge, London, 2010, p. 35.
[16] Lu, Wei, Cyber Sovereignty Must Rule Global Internet, Huffington Post, 2014. Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lu-wei/china-cyber-sovereignty_b_6324060.html (Accessed 8 December 2017).
[17] Lum, Thomas, “Internet development and information control in the People’s Republic of China”, CRS report for Congress, Library of Congress, Washington, 2006.
[18] Malcomson, Scott, How Russia and China Are Cooperating to Dismantle America’s Dominance of the Internet, Huffington Post, 2016. Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-malcomson/russia-china-internet_b_9841670.html (Accessed 7 December 2017).
[19] Marinković, Ankica, Rusija blokirala društvenu mrežu ’Linktin’, Politika, 2016. Dostupno preko: http://www.politika.rs/sr/clanak/368039/Spektar/Digitalni-svet/Rusija-blokirala-drustvenu-mrezu-Linktin (Pristupljeno 10. decembra 2017).
[20] Moody, Glyn, Why the Investigatory Powers Act is a privacy disaster waiting to happen, Ars Technica UK, 2016. Available from: https://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/11/investigatory-powers-act-privacy-disaster-waiting-to-happen (Accessed 8 December 2017).
[21] Most famous social network sites worldwide as of September 2017, ranked by number of active users (in millions), Statista, 2017. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[22] Mozur, Paul and Jie, Yang, China Argues for ’Internet Sovereignty’ Is It a Good Idea? Web blog post, 2014. Available from: https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/06/23/chinas-lays-out-argument-for-internet-sovereignty-convinced/ (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[23] Radojković, Miroljub, Stojković, Branimir i Vranješ, Aleksandar, Međunarodno komuniciranje u informacionom društvu, Clio, Beograd, 2015, str. 141.
[24] Polatin-Reuben, Dana and Wright, Joss, An Internet with BRICS Characteristics: Data Sovereignty and the Balkanisation of the Internet, 4th USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet, 2014. Available from: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/foci14/foci14-polatin-reuben.pdf (Accessed 10 December 2017), p. 3.
[25] Steele, Cherie and Stein, Arthur A. “Communications Revolutions and International Relations” in: Juliann Emmons Allison (ed.), Technology, Development and Democracy – International Conflict and Cooperation in the Information Age, State University of New York Press, Albany, 2002, p. 35.
[26] The Internet in China, People’s Daily Online, 2010. Available from: http://en.people.cn/90001/90776/90785/7017177.html (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[27] Travis, Alan, ’Snooper’s charter’ bill becomes law, extending UK state surveillance, The Guardian, 2016. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/29/snoopers-charter-bill-becomes-law-extending-uk-state-surveillance (Accessed 8 December 2017).
[28] Vujić, Ljiljana, Udar Londona na novinare i uzbunjivače, Politika, Beograd, 2017. Dostupno preko: http://www.politika.rs/sr/clanak/374220/Udar-Londona-nanovinare-i-uzbunjivace (Pristupljeno 09. decembra 2017).
[29] Xi, Jinping, Remarks by H.E. Xi Jinping President of the People’s Republic of China At the Opening Ceremony of the Second World Internet Conference, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2015. Available from: http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/zyjh_665391/t1327570.shtml (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[30] Zetter, Kim, California Now Has the Nation’s Best Digital Privacy Law, The Wired, 2015. Available from: https://www.wired.com/2015/10/california-now-nationsbest-digital-privacy-law (Accessed 10 December 2017).
[31] Zhou, Yongming, Historicizing online politics: Telegraphy, the Internet, and political participation in China, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, 2006, p. 142.
[32] 2016 Cybersecurity Law, 2016. Available from: http://www.chinalawtranslate.com/cybersecuritylaw/?lang=en (Accessed 10 December 2017).
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
