Opstanak neoliberalne hegemonije – Zašto nema relevantne alternative?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Ključne reči:
neoliberalizam, hegemonija, međunarodni ekonomski sistem, unutrašnje odlike neoliberalizma, kenzijanizam, finansijske krizeApstrakt
U ovom članku se razmatraju razlozi zašto neoliberalna hegemonija opstaje uprkos brojnim izazovima i kritikama sa kojima se suočava. Po mišljenju autora, odgovor leži u dve grupe faktora koji održavaju i šire pomenutu hegemoniju. Prva grupa odnosi se na unutrašnje odlike neoliberalizma, tj. neoliberalnih ideja, poput fluidnosti, prilagodlјivosti i uopštenosti neoliberalnih koncepata i ideja. Drugu grupu čine spolјni faktori, pre svega potrebe i interesi međunarodnog ekonomskog sistema, tj. potrebe i interesi najvažnijih ekonomija ovog sistema. U ovim interesima/potrebama može se pronaći i objašnjenje za uspon, razvoj i održivost neoliberalizma kao hegemonije na međunarodnom nivou.
Reference
[1] Barnett, Clive, Publics and markets: What’s wrong with neoliberalism, The Sage handbook of social geographies, 12, 2010, pp. 269–297.
[2]] Barnett, Clive, The consolations of ’neoliberalism’, Geoforum, 36(1), 2005, pp. 7–12.
[3] Bates, Thomas R., “Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(2), 1975, pp. 351–366.
[4] Bourdieu, Pierre. The essence of neoliberalism. Le Monde Diplomatique. December 1998. Dostupno na: http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieu. (Pristupljeno 1. 3. 2017).
[5] Buckley, Chris, “Xi Jinping’s Remedy for China’s Economic Gloom Has Echoes of Reaganomics”, The New York Times, 3 March 2016.
[6] Desai, Radhika, The Brics are building a challenge to western economic supremacy, The Guardian, 2 April 2013, p. 2.
[7] Evans, Peter, Is an alternative globalization possible? Politics & Society, 36(2), 2008, pp. 271–305.
[8] Fischer, Stanley, “The Asian Crisis: A View from the IMF” Washington, D.C., January 22, 1998. Available from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/1998/012298.htm (Accessed 10 August 2016).
[9] Gilbert, Jeremy, What Kind Of Thing Is’ Neoliberalism’? New Formations, 80(1), 2013, pp. 7–22.
[10] Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[11] Harvey, David, Neo-liberalism as creative destruction, Geografiska Annaler 88B, 2006, pp. 145–158.
[12] Hay, Colin, “The genealogy of neoliberalism” in: Roy, Ravi K., Arthur T. Denzau, and Thomas D. Willett (eds.), Neoliberalism: national and regional experiments with global ideas, Routledge, 2006, pp. 51–70.
[13] Jessop, Bob, Putting neoliberalism in its time and place: a response to the debate, Social Anthropology 21, No. 1, 2013, pp. 65–74.
[14] Jinping, Xi, Xi Jinping keynote at the World Economic Forum. [online] World Economic Forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/fulltext-of-xi-jinping-keynote-at-the-world-economic-forum [Accessed 7 July 2017].
[15] Mason, Paul, Postcapitalism: A guide to our future, Macmillan, 2016.
[16] Overbeek, Hank and Van Apeldoorn, Baastian, Neoliberalism in crisis, Palgrave Macmillan, Chichester, 2012.
[17] Palley, Thomas I., “From Keynesianism to neoliberalism: Shifting paradigms in economics” in: Alfredo Saad-Filho and Deborah Johnston, Neoliberalism: A critical reader, University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 20–29.
[18] Plehwe, Dieter, Walpen, Bernad and Neunhoffer, Gisila, “Introduction: Reconsidering neoliberal hegemony” in: D. Plehwe, B. Walpen and G. Neunhoffer (eds.), Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique (1st ed.), New York: Routledge, 2006, pp. 1–24.
[19] Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon, 2001 [1944]).
[20] Rodrik, Dani, After neoliberalism, what. Notes for The conference on Alternatives to Neoliberalism, in Washington, D.C., May 23, 2002. Available from: http://www.bndespar.com.br/SiteBNDES/export/sites/default/bndes_pt/Galerias/Arquivos/conhecimento/seminario/novosrumos_Dani.pdf (Accessed 8 August 2016).
[21] Rückert, Arne, Producing neoliberal hegemony? A neo-Gramscian analysis of the poverty reduction strategy paper (PRSP) in Nicaragua. Studies in Political Economy, 79(1), 2007, pp. 91–118.
[22] Saad-Filho, Alfredo and Johnston, Deborah, Neoliberalism: A critical reader, University of Chicago Press, 2005.
[23] Schmidt, Vivian and Thatcher, Mark, “Theorizing ideational continuity: The resilience of neo-liberal ideas in Europe” in: V. Schmidt and M. Thatcher, Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy (1st ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 1–50.
[24] Williamson, John, Short History of the Washington Consensus, A. Law & Bus. Rev. Am., 15, 2009, pp. 1–14.
[25] Wilson, Dominic and Purushothaman, Rооp, “Dreaming with BRICs: the path to 2050” in: Subhash C. Jain (ed.), Emerging economies and the transformation of international business: Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRICs), Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006, pp. 3–45.
Data base:
[1] World Development Indicators. World DateBank. World Bank. Dostupno na: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx
[2] World Economic Outlook. International Monetary Fund. Dostupno na: http://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/datasets/WEO
[3] Human Development Report. UNDP. Dostupno na: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
