The Reshaping of Global Relations in the 21st Century: Multiple World Orders?
Keywords:
global relations, international politics, hegemony, world order, multiplicity, realism, post-positivismAbstract
After almost half a century of fundamentally stable structure of international system during the Cold War, and with an intermezzo in the form of the “unipolar moment” immediately after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the first decades of the twenty first century brought about a series of turbulences and cued deep reshaping of the global relations. Unable to achieve or maintain the global- or block-level hegemony at the scale which had been attainable within the bipolar and multipolar systems of the Cold War and post-Cold War eras, the great powers predominantly fight to consolidate their positions within their respective spheres of influence, whether these are designated geographically (as regions) or functionally (as domains). On its own part, this has initiated the development of concepts like the “multiorder world” (Trine Flockhart), and multiplicity in international relations (Milja Kurki, Justin Rosenberg). Although these and similar concepts take up positions critical towards the traditional positivist theoretical approaches, it can be stated that, at the same time, they reaffirm them: while aspiring to transcend the embedded disciplinary boundaries, they necessarily, although most often unwillingly, affirm the significance of the state as not just the key actor, but also as the key reference framework for constituting the very notion of “the international”. Similarly, the aforementioned historical and theoretical-methodological changes in the study of global relations produce immediate consequences for our understanding of international realities, as well as for our presuppositions on the directions of its future development. By combining the traditional, dominantly realist postulates with the ctitiques and innovations put forward by contemporary approaches to the study o international politics, the author aspires to shed light on some of the key aspects of the reshaping of contemporary global relations.
References
[1] Baciu, Cornelia, “Interpolarity. Re-visiting Security and the Global Order”, Defence Studies, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2022, pp. 571–590.
[2] Flockhart, Trine, “The Coming Multi-order World”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2016, pp. 3–30.
[3] Herrmann, Richard K., “How Attachments to the Nation Shape Beliefs About the World: A Theory of Motivated Reasoning”, International Organization, Vol. 71, No. S1, 2017, pp. S61–S84.
[4] Holsti, Kalevi Jaako, International Politics: a Framework for Analysis, 7th Edition, Prentice Hall [NJ], 1995.
[5] Ikenberry, G. John, “Why American Power Endures”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 101, No. 6, 2022, pp. 56–74.
[6] Jianxue, Lan, “Jaishankar’s remarks reflect India’s objections to European centralism”, Global Times, June 3, 2022, Available from: https://www.globaltimes.cn/ page/202206/1267313.shtml, (Accessed 7 August 2022).
[7] Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, 2nd Edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton [NJ] – Oxford, 2005.
[8] Kirshner, Jonathan, An Unwritten Future: Realism and Uncertainty in World Politics, Princeton University Press, Princeton [NJ] – Oxford, 2022.
[9] Kissinger, Henry, World Order, Penguin Press, New York [NY], 2014.
[10] Krauthammer, Charles, “The Unipolar Moment”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 70, No. 1, 1990/1991, pp. 23–33.
[11] Krauthammer, Charles, “The Unipolar Moment Revisited”, The National Interest, No. 70, 2002/2003, pp. 5–18.
[12] Kurki, Milja, “Multiplicity expanded: IR theories, multiplicity, and the potential of trans-disciplinary dialogue”, Globalizations, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2020, pp. 560–575.
[13] Kurki, Milja and Justin Rosenberg, “Multiplicity: a new common ground for international theory?”, Globalizations, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2020, pp. 397–403.
[14] Lišanin, Mladen, “Possibilities of Assessing the Changing Nature of International Politics in the Coming Multi-Order World”, Croatian Political Science Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2017, pp. 143–160.
[15] Lišanin, Mladen, “Biden Administration’s Transatlantic Challenge”, Politika nacionalne bezbednosti, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 11–27.
[16] Menon, Shivshankar, “Nobody Wants the Current World Order”, Foreign Affairs, August 3, 2022, Available from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/nobodywants-current-world-order, (Accessed 7 August 2022).
[17] O’Rourke, Lindsey and Joshua Shifrinson, “Squaring the Circle on Spheres of Influence: The Overlooked Benefits”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2022, pp. 105–124.
[18] Pabst, Adrian, Liberal World Order and Its Critics: Civilizational States and Cultural Commonwealths, Routledge, Abingdon, 2019.
[19] Rodrik, Dani and Stephen M. Walt, “How to Build a Better Order: Limiting Great Power Rivalry in an Anarchic World”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 101, No. 5, 2022, pp. 142–155.
[20] Rosato, Sebastian, Intentions in Great Power Politics, Yale University Press, New Haven [CT] – London, 2021.
[21] Rosenberg, Justin, “International Relations in the Prison of Political Science”, International Relations, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2016, pp. 127–153.
[22] Simić, Dragan R., Rasprava o poretku, Zavod za udžbenike, Beograd, 2012.
[23] Simić, Dragan R., Svetski poredak: politika Vudroa Vilsona i Frenklina Delana Ruzvelta, Clio, Beograd, 2022.
[24] Tallis, Benjamin, “Multiplicity: Taking Responsibility for the International”, New Perspectives, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2019, pp. 166–173.
[25] Tertrais, Bruno, Entangling Alliances? Europe, the United States, Asia, and the Risk of New 1914, The Atlantic Council, Washington, D.C., 2022.
[26] Viotti, Paul R. and Mark V. Kauppi, International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond, 3rd Edition, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights [MA], 1999.
[27] Walton, C. Dale, Geopolitics and the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: Multipolarity and the Revolution in Strategic Perspective, Routledge, Abingdon, 2007.
