Бехемот Франца Нојмана: Практичне импликације на Нирнбершке процесе
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/Ključne reči:
Франц Нојман, Бехемот, Франкфуртска школа, Нирнбершки процеси, монополистички капитализам, Фридрих ПолокApstrakt
Рад се бави практичним импликацијама које је теорија изнета у најпознатијем делу Франца Нојмана имала на Нирнбeршке процесе. У првом делу изложене су основне теоријске поставке Бехемота, али и суштина дебате између Нојмана и Фридриха Полока о природи капитализма, односно нацистичког режима. У другом делу се анализира утицај поставки изнетих у Бехемоту на креирање концептуалног оквира за подизање оптужница против водећих индустријалаца Трећег рајха и приказује истраживачки рад Нојмана и његовог тима на припреми материјала за ова суђења.
Reference
[1] “R&A Report 1194: Speer’s Appointment as Dictator of the German Economy”. In: Raffaele Laudani (ed.), Secret Reports on Nazi Germany, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2013, pp. 48–60.
[2] “R&A Report 1655.5: Dissolution of the Nazi Party and Its Affiliated Organizations”. In: Raffaele Laudani (ed.), Secret Reports on Nazi Germany, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2013, pp. 253–63.
[3] “R&A Report 1655.30: German Cartels and Cartel-Like Organizations”. In: Raffaele Laudani (ed.), Secret Reports on Nazi Germany, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2013, pp. 264–84.
[4] “R&A Report 1657: The Problem of Inflation in Germany”. In: Raffaele Laudani (ed.), Secret Reports on Nazi Germany, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2013, pp. 345–96.
[5] “R&A Report 2500.15: German Military Government Over Europe: Economic Controls in Occupied Europe”.
[6] “R&A Report 3114: Nazi Plans for Dominating Germany and Europe (the Nazi Master Plan)”. In: Raffaele Laudani (ed.), Secret Reports on Nazi Germany, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2013, pp. 475–520.
[7] Aronson Shlomo, “Preparations for the Nuremberg Trial: The OSS, Charles Dwork, and the Holocaust”, Holocaust and Genocide Studies Vol. 12, No. 2, 1998, pp. 257–281.
[8] Fuchs Christian, “The Relevance of Franz L. Neumann’s Critical Theory in 2017: Anxiety and Politics in the New Age of Authoritarian Capitalis”, ТripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2017, pp. 637–650.
[9] Hilberg Raul, “The Relevance of Behemoth Today”, Constellations, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2003, pp. 256–263.
[10] Jay Martin, The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1996.
[11] ———, „Предговор: Нојман и Франкфуртска школа”. У: Франц Нојман, Владавина права, Филип Вишњић, Београд, 2002, стр. 5–10.
[12] Katz Barry M., “The Criticism of Arms: The Frankfurt School Goes to War”, The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 59, No. 3, 1987, pp. 439–478.
[13] Kellner Douglas, Critical Theory, Marxism, and Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1989.
[14] Kelly Duncan, “Rethinking Franz Neumann’s Route to Behemoth”, History of Political Thought, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2002, pp. 458–496.
[15] Kettler David, “Negotiating Exile: Franz L. Neumann as Political Scientist”. In: Caroline Anni, Andrea Glauser and Charlotte Müller (eds.), Der Eigensinn Des Materials. Erkundungen Sozialer Wirklichkeit, Stroemfeld, Frankfurt, pp. 205–224.
[16] Laudani Raffaele (ed), “Introduction”. In: Secret Reports on Nazi Germany: The Frankfurt School Contribution to the War Effort, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 1–23.
[17] Lustig Doreen, “The Nature of the Nazi State and the Question of International Criminal Responsibility of Corporate Officials at Nuremberg: Franz Neumann’s Behemoth at the Industrial Trials”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 43, 2011, pp. 965–1044.
[18] Marcuse Herbert, “Prefece”. In: Franz L. Neumann, The Democratic and the Authoritarian State, Free Press, Glencoe, 1957.
[19] Neumann Franz, Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933- 1944, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago, 2009.
[20] ———, Демократска и ауторитарна држава, Напријед, Загреб, 1974.
[21] Pollock Friedrich, “Is National Socialism a New Order?”, Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1941, pp. 440–455.
[22] ———, “State Capitalism: Its Possibilities and Limitations”. In: Andrew Aruto and Eike Gebhardt (eds.), The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, Continuum, New York, pp. 71–94.
[23] Priemel Kim Christian, The Betrayal: The Nuremberg Trials and German Divergence, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016.
[24] ———, “’A Story of Betrayal’: Conceptualizing Variants of Capitalism in the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials”. The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 85, No. 1, 2013, pp. 69–108.
[25] Salter Michael, Nazi War Crimes, US Intelligence and Selective Prosecution at Nurember, Routledge-Cavendish, New York, 2007.
[26] ———, ”The Visibility of the Holocaust: Franz Neumann and the Nuremberg Trials”. In: Robert Fine and Charles Turner (eds.), Social Theory after the Holocaust, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, pp. 197–218.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Nekomercijalno-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
